<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sloth anatomy challenge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://slothcentral.com/archives/44/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://slothcentral.com/archives/44</link>
	<description>A 12,000 year-old mystery in SW Iowa</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:51:50 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://slothcentral.com/archives/44/comment-page-1#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slothcentral.com/?p=44#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Hi Amanda. good hearing from you. Hint huh?  Any combination of enamel and dentine is going to produce a jagged edge because of the big difference in hardness.  100% dentine (the cementum has a very similar hardness) means an edge which can be self-ground smooth and sharp.  Think about who would need sharp teeth but not necessarily hard and why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Amanda. good hearing from you. Hint huh?  Any combination of enamel and dentine is going to produce a jagged edge because of the big difference in hardness.  100% dentine (the cementum has a very similar hardness) means an edge which can be self-ground smooth and sharp.  Think about who would need sharp teeth but not necessarily hard and why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://slothcentral.com/archives/44/comment-page-1#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slothcentral.com/?p=44#comment-222</guid>
		<description>I would have had the same initial guess as Pete. You really didn&#039;t give much of a clue for novices like me. 

I saw you in the paper today (http://www.press-citizen.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081017/NEWS01/810170340/1079). Shoot me an email when you get a chance. We need to catch up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have had the same initial guess as Pete. You really didn&#8217;t give much of a clue for novices like me. </p>
<p>I saw you in the paper today (<a href="http://www.press-citizen.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081017/NEWS01/810170340/1079)" rel="nofollow">http://www.press-citizen.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081017/NEWS01/810170340/1079)</a>. Shoot me an email when you get a chance. We need to catch up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://slothcentral.com/archives/44/comment-page-1#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slothcentral.com/?p=44#comment-220</guid>
		<description>Thanks Pete, I didn&#039;t know the non-orange part was 100% dentin.  That makes sense with what I&#039;ve read about the sloth&#039;s teeth.   I understand the rodent arrangement creates a very sharp but ragged edge, with the dentin wearing down faster and leaving  the enamel layer unsupported and easily chipped.  If true, that may be a helpful clue to the puzzle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Pete, I didn&#8217;t know the non-orange part was 100% dentin.  That makes sense with what I&#8217;ve read about the sloth&#8217;s teeth.   I understand the rodent arrangement creates a very sharp but ragged edge, with the dentin wearing down faster and leaving  the enamel layer unsupported and easily chipped.  If true, that may be a helpful clue to the puzzle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Eyheralde</title>
		<link>http://slothcentral.com/archives/44/comment-page-1#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Eyheralde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slothcentral.com/?p=44#comment-219</guid>
		<description>If you look at a rodent&#039;s four incisors, the orange enamal is mostly on the front surface of the teeth.  There&#039;s a little overlap on the sides, but not by much.  The enamel is much harder than the white dentin, which makes up rest of the tooth.  When chewing down trees or through walnut shells, the softer dentin wears away faster than the enamel. This creates a chisel-like (and self sharpening) cutting surface to the teeth as they wear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at a rodent&#8217;s four incisors, the orange enamal is mostly on the front surface of the teeth.  There&#8217;s a little overlap on the sides, but not by much.  The enamel is much harder than the white dentin, which makes up rest of the tooth.  When chewing down trees or through walnut shells, the softer dentin wears away faster than the enamel. This creates a chisel-like (and self sharpening) cutting surface to the teeth as they wear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://slothcentral.com/archives/44/comment-page-1#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slothcentral.com/?p=44#comment-218</guid>
		<description>hi Pete, right you are. . . it wouldn&#039;t be that easy!  You&#039;re the real naturalist in this bunch--is that orange enamel on all sides of the teeth or just the out-side?  A different kind of enamel?  Different hardness? It&#039;s not merely a different color is it?--what would be the point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Pete, right you are. . . it wouldn&#8217;t be that easy!  You&#8217;re the real naturalist in this bunch&#8211;is that orange enamel on all sides of the teeth or just the out-side?  A different kind of enamel?  Different hardness? It&#8217;s not merely a different color is it?&#8211;what would be the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Eyheralde</title>
		<link>http://slothcentral.com/archives/44/comment-page-1#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Eyheralde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slothcentral.com/?p=44#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Given the self sharpening, ever-growing clue, my first guess would be something in the Order Rodentia.  Beavers, woodchucks, squirrels and the like.  But I&#039;m pretty sure that the orange outer layer of material on a rodent&#039;s incisors is enamel, not cementum. So I&#039;ll have to keep looking....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the self sharpening, ever-growing clue, my first guess would be something in the Order Rodentia.  Beavers, woodchucks, squirrels and the like.  But I&#8217;m pretty sure that the orange outer layer of material on a rodent&#8217;s incisors is enamel, not cementum. So I&#8217;ll have to keep looking&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
